Radha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91849 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2025 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Radha Devi W/o- Mr. Anil Rai R/v- Rustampur Ps- Raghopur Dist- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate Mrs. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate Mr. Ritwik Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 74, 352 and 351(2) of B.N.S. Later on, Section 103 of B.N.S. was added.

3. The case of the prosecution is that altogether 12 persons have assaulted the brother of the informant with bricks and iron rod. The injured was rushed to N.M.C.H. Later on, he died.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that her name is not there in the FIR rather her name has surfaced after one month in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91849 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/2 statement of the mother of the deceased which is just addition in the list of the accused persons. He has further submitted that even the accused persons who are named in the FIR do not carry any specific allegation. There is no any specific overt act against this petitioner. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, she is languishing in judicial custody since 15.10.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 247 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T