← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./89958/2025allowed

Tanish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-09Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89958 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-404 Year-2024 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Tanish Kumar S/o- Rajesh Kumar Resident of Majlishpur P.S- Bidupur, DistVaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Mahendra Thakur, Adviocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Singh Shastri, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 404 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Sections 308(3) and 308(5) of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 19.07.2024 at about 11:34 AM, a threatening call has been received by the husband of the informant. Allegedly the said call has been received from one mobile no. 7370081104.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89958 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026 2/3 case. Learned counsel has further submitted that the mobile number which has been disclosed in the FIR, does not belong to the petitioner. The petitioner was remanded in other case and in that case, he has given his confessional statement and due to that reason, he has been impleaded in this case. Save and except his confessional statement, there is nothing against him. There is allegation of demand but no money was paid to anybody. He has further submitted that similarly situated other co-accused person has already been granted bail by learned co-ordinate Bench of this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 50180 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing.

5. In contra, learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 404 of 2024, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89958 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026 3/3 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of B.N.S.S.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) shubham/- U T