Abhishekh Kumar @ Abhishek Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.126 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-587 Year-2025 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== Abhishekh Kumar @ Abhishek Kumar S/O Vijay Sao Resident of villageJanakpur,Manpur, p.s- Gaya Muffasil, Dist.- Gaya Ji ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Mayank Shekhar, Advocate Mr. Shivam Gupta, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S..
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that daughter of informant was married to this petitioner in the year 2015 as per Hindu rites and rituals and after the marriage, she was subjected to cruelty and harassment by the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, for dowry and lastly on 17.06.2025, brother-in-law of the deceased informed the informant that his daughter has committed suicide by consuming poison.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.126 of 2026(2) dt.13-02-2026 2/3 Informant suspects that all the accused persons, including this petitioner, killed his daughter by administrating poison.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely because he happens to be husband of the deceased. As a matter of fact, due to petty family feud, the deceased committed suicide by consuming poison. It is further submitted that charges have already been framed against this petitioner and case is running for prosecution witnesses. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 14.07.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, materials that have surfaced during course of investigation, clean antecedents of the petitioner and period of custody, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.126 of 2026(2) dt.13-02-2026 3/3 connection with Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 587 of 2025. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T