Patna High CourtCR. MISC./89910/2025bail rejected

Harilal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-22Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89910 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1255 Year-2025 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Harilal Kumar S/O Sri Bharat Bhagat R/O Village- Mustafapur, P.SAhiyapur, Distt.- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sagar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in Ahiyapur P. S. Case No.1255 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act and Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 408.835 litres of liquor from a Litchi orchard near the house of the petitioner and a motorcycle was also seized along with 10 live cartridges from house of the petitioner.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89910 of 2025(3) dt.22-01-2026 2/2 allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that liquor was recovered from a place adjacent to the house of the petitioner and thereafter, it is alleged that on subsequent information, the house of the petitioner was raided and 10 live cartridges were recovered. It is also reiterated and submitted that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application and submits that specific allegation is of recovery of 10 live cartridges from the house of the petitioner. It is also submitted that investigation of the case is in its nascent stages.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned A.P.P., the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. The prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T