Vishal Paswan @ Bishal Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.285 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2024 Thana- Geedha District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Vishal Paswan @ Bishal Paswan Son of Rajesh Paswan Resident of VillageGidha PS-Gidha, Dist- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Swarnima For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Gidha P.S. Case No. 136 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 309(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that while the informant went to attend the call of nature, two bikers came and on gun point snatched the mobile and Rs. 500/- from him.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. During course of investigation, the name of this petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Ujala Kumar who has already been granted bail by this court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.285 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026 2/2 vide Cr. Misc. No. 85646 of 2025. Nothing has been recovered regarding the alleged occurrence from the possession of this petitioner. It is worth mentioning that as per the case of the prosecution, only a mobile and Rs. 500/- were looted by the miscreants. Save and except confessional statement, there is nothing against this petitioner. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 30.10.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner has got four criminal antecedent.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Bhojpur Ara in connection with Gidha P.S. Case No. 136 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) shubham/- U T