Harendra Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90327 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2025 Thana- JALALPUR District- Saran ====================================================== 1.
Harendra Sah Son of Nathuni Sah Resident of Village- Vishunpura P.SJalalpur, Dist- Saran 2.
Laddu Kumar @ Laddu Kr. Sah son of Harendra Sah Resident of VillageVishunpura P.S- Jalalpur, Dist- Saran 3.
Gaya Sah son of Nathuni Sah Resident of Village- Vishunpura P.S- Jalalpur, Dist- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhananjay Mr. Amit Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Chetna For the State :
Mr. Nawal Kishore Pd.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-04-2026
1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Jalalpur Police Station Case No. 199 of 2025, dated 07.09.2025, disclosing offences under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/118(1)/109/303(2)/352/351(2)/3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. The prosecution case, as per the First Information Report, is that on 05.09.2025 in the evening, on the point of theft of clothes all accused persons abused the informant and upon protest, the informant was assaulted by petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90327 of 2025(4) dt.21-04-2026 2/3 no. 2 by means of farsa on his head causing injury. Petitioner no. 1 snatched hanuman locate and there is no specific allegation against the petitioner no. 3.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the parties are neighbours and on trivial issue of theft of clothes a scuffle took place between them. He next submits that allegation against the petitioners are general and omnibus in nature except allegation against the petitioner no. 2, who allegedly assaulted the informant by means of farsa. He further submits that injury caused to the informant is simple in nature.
5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is specific allegation against petitioner no. 2, who assaulted the informant by means of farsa causing head injury.
6. Learned counsel for the State, referring to the case diary and injury report, pointed out that description of injuries are not mentioned, however, doctor has opined the injuries are simple in nature.
7. Having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that both the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90327 of 2025(4) dt.21-04-2026 3/3 parties are neighbours and on trivial issue the occurrence took place, injuries sustained by the informant are simple in nature and there is general and omnibus allegation against petitioner no. 1 and 3, I am inclined to grant the petitioners privilege of anticipatory bail.
8. This application is, accordingly, allowed.
9. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within four weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Jalalpur Police Station Case No. 199 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) ashwani/- U T