Md. Habibur Rahman v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.810 of 2020 ====================================================== Md. Habibur Rahman Son of late Abdul Rauf @ Abdul Rof at Present Head Moulvi Madrasa Majidia No. 1461, Resident of Village- Gosaipur, P.O. Arihana, P.S. Azamnagar, District- Katihar.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Bihar, Patna.
2.
The District Education Officer, Katihar.
3.
The District Programme Officer (Est), Katihar. 4.
The Block Education Officer, Azam Nagar Block, District- Katihar. 5.
The Chairman, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, Bihar, Patna. 6.
The Secretary, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, Bihar, Patna. 7.
The Inspector, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, Bihar, Patna. 8.
The Examination Controller, Bihar State Madrasa Education Board, Bihar, Patna.
9.
Md. Musa, Son of late Daud Ali, Resident of Village- Gosaipur, P.O. Arihana, P.S.- Azamnagar, District- Katihar.
10.
Sirajuddin, Son of Abdul Kuddus, Resident of Village- Gosaipur, P.O. Arihana, P.S.- Azamnagar, District- Katihar.
11.
Anwarul Haque, Son of Abdul Resident of Village- Gosaipur, P.O. Arihana, P.S.- Azamnagar, District- Katihar.
... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Abdul Wadood, Adv.
For the Respondents :
Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey (Aag15) Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Adv.
For the Madarsa Board :
Md. Anis Akhtar, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 18-02-2020 After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to move the appropriate authorities for redressal of his grievances, especially in view of the fact that the examination in question is already over.
Patna High Court CWJC No.810 of 2020(2) dt.18-02-2020 2/2 Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as not pressed however, with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority for redressal of his grievances. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) K.K.RAO/- U