← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2713/2020dismiss for nonprosecution

Anup Kumar v. Chairman Cum Managing Director

2024-04-09Justice Smt. G. Anupama Chakravarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2713 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Anup Kumar S/o Rajendra Prasad Proprietor of M/s Raju Battery and Electronics, R/o Near Babu Bazar, Mohan Cinema, Ara, Distt.- Bhojpur (Bihar) 2.

Sunil Kumar S/o Rajendra Prasad Proprietor of M/s Raju Battery and Electronics, R/o Near Babu Bazar, Mohan Cinema, Ara, Distt.- Bhojpur (Bihar) 3.

Sunil Kumar S/o Rajendra Prasad R/o Near Babu Bazar, Mohan Cinema, Ara, Distt.- Bhojpur (Bihar) ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

Chairman Cum Managing Director Oriental Bank of Commerce, Plot No. 5, Institutional Area, Sector-32, Gurugram-122001 2.

Dy. General Manager Oriental Bank of Commerce, Regional Office, Patna 3.

Dy. General Manager Oriental Bank of Commerce, Recovery and Law Department, Corporate Office, Plot No. 5, First Floor, Sector-32, Institutional Area, Gurugram-122001 4.

The Senior Manager Oriental Bank of Commerce, Arrah, District- Bhojpur, Bihar ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

None For the Respondents :

Mr. Nishi Nath Ojha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 09-04-2024 No representation on behalf of the petitioners.

2. The matter is coming up for hearing since 13.03.2024. The counter affidavit was filed by the learned counsel for the respondents in the open Court and the learned counsel for the petitioners sought time for filing rejoinder to the counter affidavit. On 27.03.2024, at the request of the learned counsel for the petitioners, as a last indulgence, the matter was directed to be listed on 05.04.2024. Today, there is no

Patna High Court CWJC No.2713 of 2020(7) dt.09-04-2024 2/2 representation on behalf of the petitioners, therefore, this Court is of the considerable view that the petitioners have no interest to evince with the matter.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as default and for non-prosecution.

(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) Shanu/- U