Indal Mahra @ Indal Kumar Ram @ Andal Mehra v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90752 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2025 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Indal Mahra @ Indal Kumar Ram @ Indal Mehra Son of Ram Prakash Mahra Village -Bhagwatipur PS -Ladaniya (Ladania) District -Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-01-2026 Heard Mr.Ravi Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 25.09.2025 in connection with Ladaniya (Ladania) P.S. Case No. 102 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 25.03.2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2),3(5) of BNS.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted to the son of the informant with Farsa.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. Although the petitioner is named in the FIR, there is specific allegation against the petitioner in the FIR that he assaulted to the son of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90752 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026 2/3 the informant and he has received the injury. There is case and counter case. Further submits that it appears from the FIR itself that due to some petty dispute the present occurrence had taken place. Although the son of the informant has received the injury but there is no intention of the petitioner to kill him. The police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 25.09.2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid fact, petitioner has clean antecedent, there is case and counter case as well as period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M,Madhubani in connection with Ladaniya (Ladania) P.S. Case No. 102 of 2025,with the following conditions:- (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90752 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026 3/3 witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T