Patna High CourtCR. MISC./90360/2025bail rejected

Balwant Kumar Singh @ Bullet Singh @ Bulet Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-19Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90360 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2020 Thana- DARAUNDA District- Siwan ====================================================== Balwant Kumar Singh @ Bullet Singh @ Bulet Singh S/O Late Nand Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Pasnauli, P.S.- Maharajganj, District - Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 19-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Daraunda P.S. Case no. 206 of 2020 registered under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, while the petitioner was coming on his motorcycle, it is stated that two accused persons on another motorcycle overtook him and thereafter snatched the informant's motorcycle and fled away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was registered against unknown. The petitioner was falsely implicated in course of investigation. The informant is alleged to have identified the petitioner in the police station by seeing his photograph. The petitioner is in custody since 10.6.2025 and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90360 of 2025(4) dt.19-03-2026 2/2 chargesheet has been submitted in the case. The cause of false implication is his antecedents.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State who submits that the petitioner was identified by the informant seeing his photograph and further the petitioner has six criminal antecedents of similar nature.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the material that has transpired in course of investigation and the informant having identified the petitioner seeing his photograph, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

7. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail on completing one year in custody. (Partha Sarthy, J) sauravkrsinha/- U T