Mahendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4128 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2018 Thana- HULASGANJ District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.
Mahendra Yadav Son of Dhaneshwar Yadav Resident of Village - Baigani, P.S.- Hulasganj, District- Jehanabad 2.
Suryamani Devi Wife of Mahendra Yadav Resident of Village - Baigani, P.S.- Hulasganj, District- Jehanabad 3.
Chhotu Kumar Son of Mahendra Yadav Resident of Village - Baigani, P.S.- Hulasganj, District- Jehanabad 4.
Ram Kumar Yadav Son of Mahendra Yadav Resident of Village - Baigani, P.S.- Hulasganj, District- Jehanabad 5.
Seema Devi @ Seema Kumari D/O - Mahendra Yadav Resident of Village - Baigani, P.S.- Hulasganj, District- Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Tej Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Veena Rani Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 23-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State along with the learned counsel for the informant.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 233 of 2018 registered for the offence under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners, who are of clean antecedent, are innocent and have not committed any offence. In fact, the petitioners happen to be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4128 of 2020(3) dt.23-06-2020 2/2 close relative of the husband of the deceased and they have no concern with the alleged occurrence. Moreover, the husband of the deceased who is responsible for the occurrence has been taken into custody since 14.11.2019. No specific case of demand of dowry and assault is made out against these petitioners. Hence, the petitioner deserves the privilege of anticipatory bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the even of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing their personal bonds to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jehanabad in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 233 of 2018, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T