Patna High CourtCR. MISC./90273/2025dismissed

Raju Sah @ Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-10Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90273 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Begusarai ====================================================== Raju Sah @ Raju Kumar Son of Ramchandra Sah R/o Village - Naula(Noula), Ward No. 15, P.S. - Bhagwanpur, District - Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Gulnar Begum, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. At the outset, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that the same is not maintainable as proceedings under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. has already been issued. In this connection, reliance is placed upon recent judgment of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90273 of 2025(2) dt.10-02-2026 2/2 Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Prem Shankar Prasad versus the State of Bihar and Another reported in LL 2021 SC 579.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case the fact that proceedings under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. has already been issued against the petitioner and judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court rendered in the case of Prem Shankar Prasad (supra), the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T