Md. Salauddin @ Md.Slauddin v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90124 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2025 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== Md. Salauddin @ Md.Slauddin Son of Md. Raju Resident of Village- Pakki Sarai, Teen Kothia, Ward No. 42, P.S.- Mithanpura (Mithanpura), DistrictMuzaffarpur. Presently Resident of Village- Malighat Sar Saiyat Coloy, P.S.- Mithanpura, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Khushi Awadh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Gulnar Begum, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Dalsingh Sarai P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Sections 303(2), 334(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that the statues of Lord Ram, Sita and Laxman amounting to Rs. 50,00,000/- were stolen by unknown thief by breaking the lock of the temple.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90124 of 2025(2) dt.16-01-2026 2/2 transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Md. Firoz. No incriminating/theft article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that T.I.P. has not been conducted till date. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the stolen articles. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 14.03.2025 and has no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Dalsingh Sarai P.S. Case No. 30 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T