Akhilesh Yadav @ Akhilesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.5617 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-508 Year-2019 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== AKHILESH YADAV @ AKHILESH KUMAR YADAV, Son of Rajendar Yadav, Resident of Village - Dhamichak, Police Station - Barachatti (Mohanpur), District - Gaya.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar No2, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 06-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the "SC/ST Act") against the refusal of prayer for regular bail vide order dated 26.11.2019 in B.P. No. 279 of 2019 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Judge S.C./S.T. Act, Gaya in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 508 of 2019 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 379, 457, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act as well as Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the SC/ST Act. Allegation is of commission of assault. The Doctor has found simple injury.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.5617 of 2019 dt.06-02-2020 2/2 Considering the aforesaid fact, let the appellant, above named, who is in custody since 27.10.2019 and investigation of the case is complete against the appellant, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, subject to the following conditions:- (a) The appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

(c) The appellant shall not leave the country without permission of the learned trial court.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- AFR/NAFR N.A.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 07.02.2020 Transmission Date 07.02.2020