Jamun Sah @ Yamuna Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84819 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-844 Year-2018 Thana- SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.
JAMUN SAH @ YAMUNA SAH, Son of Suraj Sah, 2.
Madhuri Devi, Wife of Jamun Sah, Both Residents of Village- Chainpur Dhaka, Ward No. 12, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran at Motihari.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Rupa Devi, Wife of Anil Kumar, Resident of Village- Chainpur Dhaka, Ward No. 12, P.S.- Dhaka, District- East Champaran, at Motihari, presently residing at Daughter of Suresh Sah, Village- Baigania Jawahar Tola, Ward No. 12, P.S.- Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amit Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the complainant and learned APP for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable Complaint C1 844/2018. Prosecution case in brief is that the complainant Rupa Devi was married to the petitioner on 02.06.2013 according to the Hindu rites and customs. Allegation of the complainant was subjected to cruelty and harassment by the petitioners including the petitioner on account of insufficient dowry. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84819 of 2019(2) dt.14-02-2020 2/2 petitioners are falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the complainant. There was no demand of dowry from the complainant by the petitioners. There is no specific allegation against the petitioners.
In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Sadar, Sitamarhi in connection with Sitamarhi Complaint Case No. C1 844/2018 / C.I.S. No.844/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T