Patna High CourtCR. MISC./86829/2019dismissed

Shree Ram Singh @ Siya Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2021-03-05Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86829 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2001 Thana- LAKHISARAI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== SHREE RAM SINGH @ SIYA RAM SINGH Son of Ghuto Singh @ Ghutu Singh @ Baleshwar Singh Resident of Village - Mahsaura, P.S.- Lakhisarai, Distt.- Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Lakhisarai P.S. Case No.197/2001, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

Informant has alleged in his written complaint that while he was returning his house after cutting grass from Nadiyawan Ghat Bahiyar and in the meanwhile Shree Ram Singh came there and fired four rounds at him from behind with intention to kill and he sustained two pellet injuries near his waist, one pellet injury at left hand and he sustained severe injuries and fell down. On hulla and hearing the sound of firing,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86829 of 2019(5) dt.05-03-2021 2/2 villagers came there and on seeing them, Shree Ram Singh fled away. It is also stated that Balmiki Yadav and Budhu Mandal had seen the occurrence and he was brought towards village. On getting information, his family members and his villagers arrived and he was brought in the clinic for his treatment. Considering the fact that there is specific allegation against petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner above-named on bail.

Accordingly, the same is rejected. However, trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within one year from the date of receipt/production of copy of order passed by this court. If trial is not concluded within one year petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

(S. Kumar, J) Prakash Narayan /- U T