Satyendra Nut @ Satendra Nat v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91988 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2025 Thana- AMNAUR District- Saran ====================================================== Satyendra Nut @ Satendra Nat S/o- Late Ramchandra Nut Resident of village- Olhanpur Police station-Marhowrah District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms.Mili Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Amnaur P.S. Case No. 181 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 305(a) of the B.N.S.
3. The prosecution case is to the effect that the informant has alleged that certain unknown persons entered his house and took away gold ornaments.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely because he carries long list of criminal antecedents against his name. It has further been submitted that the name of the petitioner has transpired in the confessional statement of coaccused, namely, Rakesh Nut and Vishvanath Nut, who were
2/4 apprehended in Amnaur P.S. Case No. 197 of 2025 where they have admitted their complicity in the present case. It has further been submitted that the seizure of some items were made on the lead given by the co-accused Rakesh Nut and no incriminating article has been recovered either on the confession of the petitioner or from his conscious possession. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 11.08.2025 and he carries 12 criminal antecedents.
5. The learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the aforesaid submission, facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Amnaur P.S. Case No. 181 of 2025 subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close relative and the other shall be local resident. (ii) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each date of the trial.
(iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates or in
3/4 violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned. (iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.
(v) The learned Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(vi) In view of the antecedent of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next nine months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in this period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the
4/4 petitioner before the court concerned, order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed.
8. It is made clear that the observation, if any, made in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial. (Sourendra Pandey, J) aditya/- U