Manoj Hansada v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85144 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2014 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada ====================================================== MANOJ HANSADA Son of Mangaru Hansada Resident of VillageChailkakhar, P.O.- Charakapatthar, P.S.- Sono, District- Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Man Mohan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 16-01-2020 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Kawakola PS Case No. 45 of 2014 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 353, 307, 120B of the IPC, Section 27 of the Arms Act, Sections 3⁄4 of Explosive Substances Act and Sections 13, 16, 18, 20 of U.L.P Act. Prosecution case is that three named and about hundred unknown miscreants resorted to firing upon the police and polling party while they were returning after completing the polling. Counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not amongst three named persons. On account of suspicion petitioner has been named as one amongst hundred unknown accused persons. There is no criminal antecedent of the petitioner and other than suspicion there is nothing on record to connect the petitioner with the instant case. He is in custody since 13.9.2019. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions the petitioner's prayer for bail is allowed.

Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85144 of 2019(2) dt.16-01-2020 2/2 his furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM Nawada in Kawakola PS Case No. 45 of 2014 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date in the trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to the cancelled. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U T