Mundrika Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.564 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-341 Year-2019 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== MUNDRIKA PRASAD Son of Rupchand Prasad Resident of Village - Kosambhatri, P.S.- Sirdala, Distt.- Nawada ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Anish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Parmanand Prasad, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

There is allegation of recovery of about 200 liters of liquor near the Anganbari center.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the recovery has been made from a public place and he is no way concerned with the recovery, as the same has not been recovered from his conscious possession. The mandatory provision under Section 100 Cr.P.C. has not been followed at the time of seizure. Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge II cum Special Judge Excise Act, Nawada in Sirdala Police Station Case No. 341/2019, on the following

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.564 of 2020(2) dt.19-02-2020 2/2 conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T