Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2105/2026allowed

Sonu Nut v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-05Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2105 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-689 Year-2024 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Sonu Nut S/o Sunil Nut R/o village - Ghogwaliya, P.S - Kopa, District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Meena Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 689 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 310(2) of the Bihar Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The case of the prosecution is that while the informant was returning on his motorcycle with his associate Suraj Kumar, seven persons on three motorcycles surrounded him and on gun point snatched his bracelet and chain of gold.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has also been submitted that the F.I.R. was filed against

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2105 of 2026(2) dt.05-02-2026 2/2 unknown miscreants. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was arrested in Kopa P.S. Case No. 175 of 2025 and thereafter he was remanded in other case and in the present case. No T.I.P. has been conducted. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 29.07.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Saran, Chapra in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 689 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T