Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4670/2026dismissed

Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-12Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4670 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-328 Year-2022 Thana- UJIYARPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Vikash Kumar S/O Ram Bilash Singh R/O village - Lagunia Raghukanth ward no. 10, P.S. - Samastipur Muffasil, Dist. - Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar Roy, Adv Mr. Uma Shankar Singh, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sangeeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Ujiarpur P.S.Case No. 328 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Section 382/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 09.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.3470 of 2025 which reads as under:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ujiarpur P.S.Case No.

328 of 2022 registered for the offence under section 382/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4670 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026 2/2

3. Unknown criminals looted the collection agent of Bandhan Bank. The petitioner has given a confession. He is accused in ten more cases of similar and serious nature. The petitioner is in jail since 13.08.2024.

4. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner."

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the charge has been framed.

5. Considering the gravity of the offence and the fact that the trial has started, I am not inclined to review my earlier order.

6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) N.K/- U T