Pawrit Yadav @ Pawrith Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86901 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2019 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

PAWRIT YADAV @ PAWRITH YADAV Son of Chutar Yadav Resident of Village - Govindpur, P.S.- Jhajha, Distt - Jamui. 2.

Rohit Yadav Son of Pawrit Yadav @ Pawrith Yadav Resident of Village - Govindpur, P.S.- Jhajha, Distt - Jamui.

3.

Deepak Yadav Son of Pawrit Yadav @ Pawrith Yadav Resident of Village - Govindpur, P.S.- Jhajha, Distt - Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sanjay Yadav Son of Bhuwan Yadav Resident of Village - Govindpur, P.S.- Jhajha, Distt - Jamui.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Sumiran Rai For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 24-01-2020 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 241 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 436, 379, 427, 384 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation is regarding the accused persons including the petitioners herein having arrived at the house of the informant and had slapped the informant and his family members whereafter the accused persons had demanded extortion money

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86901 of 2019(2) dt.24-01-2020 2/3 and had also set the cow house on fire.

The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and they are having a clean antecedent. It is further submitted that a title suit is going on from before in between the parties and on account of the said land dispute, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, coupled with the fact that the petitioners are having a clean antecedent and no grievous injury is stated to have been inflicted on the members of the prosecution party, I deem it fit and proper to admit the petitioners to the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Jamui in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 241 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86901 of 2019(2) dt.24-01-2020 3/3 Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U T