Ajay Singh @ Ajay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91869 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2010 Thana- BUXAR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBuxar ====================================================== Ajay Singh @ Ajay Kumar Singh S/o Hari Kishun Singh R/o VillageKharwaniyan, P.S.- Sikraul, District- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Jairam Singh S/o Late Mangal Singh R/o vill and P.O. - Basawn Kala, P.s.- Sikraul, Distt.- Buxar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered under Sections 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, informant solemnized the marriage of his daughter with petitioner in the year 2004. In marriage, ornaments, cloths of about Rs. 2 lakhs were given. After some time of marriage, the husband and in laws of informant's daughter started demanding a motorcycle from her. Due to non-fulfillment of the same, she was tortured and ill treated. It is further alleged on 01.11.2009, informant
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91869 of 2025(3) dt.06-04-2026 2/3 received information in telephone that his daughter has been murdered.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submission is that the marriage was solemnized in the year 2004 and death of the informant's daughter was in the year 2009 due to illness. Police has submitted the final form and found allegation false and recommended prosecution against the informant, however, on the Protest petition, the complaint case was registered. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the trial.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, police has submitted final form and clean antecedent of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-I,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91869 of 2025(3) dt.06-04-2026 3/3 Court No. 5, Buxar in connection with Protest Complaint Case No. 173(C) of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) utkarsh/- U T