Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2133/2020dismissed

Krishna Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-16Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2133 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-461 Year-2019 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Krishna Manjhi, Son of Hindu Manjhi Resident of Village - Shyam Cinema Road, P.S.- Gopalganj Town, Distt - Gopalganj. 2.

Dabblu Manjhi @ Dabbalu Kumar Son of Krishna Manjhi Resident of Village - Shyam Cinema Road, P.S.- Gopalganj Town, Distt - Gopalganj. 3.

Chhotu Kumar Son of Krishna Manjhi Resident of Village - Shyam Cinema Road, P.S.- Gopalganj Town, Distt - Gopalganj. 4.

Meth Kumar @ Umesh Kumar Son of Krishna Manjhi Resident of Village - Shyam Cinema Road, P.S.- Gopalganj Town, Distt - Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sadanand Paswan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-01-2020 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Gopalganj Town P. S. Case No. 461 of 2019, disclosing offences under Sections 272 and 273 of IPC and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. Recovery of huge quantity of liquor from the semi constructed house of the petitioners. Petitioners are father and sons.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that they are not residing there and on confessional statement, their names transpires.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2133 of 2020(2) dt.16-01-2020 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that recovery is from the house of the petitioners. As such, there are materials available against the petitioners.

Having heard both sides, in view of the submissions, made above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. However, they have to surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail, the same shall be considered on its own merit, without being prejudiced by this order.

With the aforesaid, this application is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T