← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1844/2019disposed

Naulakha Khan @ Naulakh Khan v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Home Police Deptt., Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2022-09-21Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1844 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2019 Thana- BASANTPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== Naulakha Khan @ Naulakh Khan, Son of Hasruddin Resident of VillageKhawaspur, P.S.- Basantpur, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Home Police Deptt., Govt. Of Bihar, Patna Bihar, 2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The DIG, Saran Division, Chapra.

4.

The IG, Muzaffarpur. Muzaffarpur.

5.

The Superintendent of Police, Siwan.

6.

The SHO, Bansantpur Police Station, District- Siwan 7.

Md. Aakib Son of Sheikh Taki Imam Resident of Village- Lakhnaura Kishunpura, P.S.- Basantpur (Lakdi Nabiganj O.P.), District- Siwan. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Kanishk Kaustubh, Adv.

Mr. Ayush Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Shekhar Mani, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar, AC to GP-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 21-09-2022 Mr. Kanishk Kaustubh, learned advocate appears on instruction from Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner.

This Court has been informed that during pendency of this writ application a charge-sheet has already been filed. It appears from the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not satisfied with the investigation. Learned counsel, however on query submits that the petitioner has not

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1844 of 2019(3) dt.21-09-2022 2/2 availed his remedy seeking further investigation in this case. Mr. Deepak Kumar, learned AC to GP-4 is present for the State. It is submitted that so far as the present writ application is concerned, it has become infructuous. This Court agrees with the submission of learned counsel for the State that the present writ application which was filed solely seeking a proper investigation of the case has become infructuous at this stage. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the investigation and is looking for further investigation or re-investigation of the case, he may seek his remedy as may be advised to him in accordance with law.

This application stands disposed of accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.