Rani Devi v. The Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20612 of 2025 ====================================================== Rani Devi, Wife of Rajesh Kumar, Resident of Village- Lodiya, P.OSabikpur, P.S and Anchal and District- Lakhisarai at present R/O- Lallu Pokhar Argra Road, P.S-Kasim Bazar, P.O and District- Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union of India through the General Manager, East Central Railway, Hazipur.
2.
The DRM Danapur, East Central Railway, Danapur, Patna, Bihar, PIN801105. 3.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5.
The Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6.
The Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Govt of Bihar, Patna.
7.
The Collector-Cum- District Magistrate, Lakhisarai. 8.
The Deputy Development Commissioner -Cum- Chief Executive Officer, District Board, Lakhisarai.
9.
The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Lakhisarai. 10.
The Circle Officer, Anchal and District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Additional Solicitor General.
For the Nagar Parishad :
Mr. Avinash Kumar, Advocate.
Mr. Kumar Satyam, Advocate.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 24-12-2025 Without going into the merits or demerits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission with the consent of the Counsels.
2. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner has
Patna High Court CWJC No.20612 of 2025(2) dt.24-12-2025 2/2 already made a representation dated 06.09.2025 (Annexure P/6) ventilating her grievance before the Deputy Development Commissioner-cum-Chief Executive Officer, District Board, Lakhisarai i.e. the Respondent No. 8 herein, however, the authority has not passed any order till date. The authority i.e. Respondent No. 8 herein is directed to consider the representation dated 06.09.2025 (Annexure P/6) made by the petitioner. The authority shall endeavour to pass necessary orders strictly in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order. It is needless to observe that before passing any order the petitioner shall be given an opportunity of hearing.
Any order passed shall be communicated to the party.
3. With the above directions, the present Writ Petition stands disposed of.
(A. Abhishek Reddy, J) shakir/- U