Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85855/2019bail granted

Samrat Yadav @ Amarjeet Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-16Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85855 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-966 Year-2019 Thana- SAHARSA District- Saharsa ====================================================== SAMRAT YADAV @ AMARJEET YADAV S/o Satrughan Prasad Yadav @ Shatrughan Prasad Resident of Village- Batraha Ward No. 26, P.S.- Saharsa, District- Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner who is in custody seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of supplying arms and ammunition.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on suspicion. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 30.10.2019. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85855 of 2019(2) dt.16-01-2020 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending, in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 966 of 2019, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U