Sajid v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90562 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-272 Year-2017 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria ====================================================== Sajid Son of Masiur Rahman Resident of Village- Kakora, Ward No. 9, P.S.- Mahalgaon, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Md Naushaduzzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard Mr.Md Naushaduzzoha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 15.10.2025 in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No.272/2017, dated 12.08.2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341,342,323,324,325,307,379,504,506/34 of IPC.
3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he alongwith 02-03 unknown persons assaulted to the informant by means of sword causing injury on his neck.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. Although
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90562 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/3 the petitioner is named in the FIR and there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted to the informant by means of sword and he has received six injuries but the injuries inflicted upon the informant are simple in nature and the police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 15.10.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, petitioner has clean antecedent and the injuries inflicted upon the informant are simple in nature, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Araria in connection with Jokihat P.S. Case No.272/2017, with the following conditions:- (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90562 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 3/3 for cancellation of bail.
(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T