Bhanu Pratap Singh @ Rajiv Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1427 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-365 Year-2025 Thana- SISWAN District- Siwan ====================================================== Bhanu Pratap Singh @ Rajiv Singh S/O Late Lallan Singh R/O VillageChhajwa, P.S- Andar, Distt.- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Babu Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

02. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No. 365 of 2025 registered for the alleged offences under Sections 303(2), 317(5) and 318(4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

03. As per prosecution case, on receiving information about petitioner keeping a stolen motorcycle at his house. A raid was conducted and the motorcycle was seized. The petitioner could not produce any document for the said motorcycle.

04. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that no recovery has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner as the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1427 of 2026(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/3 recovery has been shown in front of the house where petitioner stays as one of the tenants. But the seizure list does not bear signature of even the caretaker or owner of the house. The mobiles recovered from the petitioner's room are not stolen property. The petitioner is having antecedent of one case in which he is on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 13.10.2025 and charge-sheet has been submitted.

05. Learned APP for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned APP submits that the petitioner bears antecedent of similar nature.

06. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the nature of allegation and period of custody of the petitioner along with submission of charge-sheet, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VII, Siwan/court concerned in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No. 365 of 2025, subject to the conditions mentioned in Section 480(3) of BNSS and the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1427 of 2026(2) dt.15-01-2026 3/3 (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Ashish/- U T