← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1128/2026bail granted

Md. Anwarul v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-22Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1128 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-94 Year-2025 Thana- Bathnaha District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Anwarul son of Md. Irshad Resident of village- Fena Belahi, Ward no. 12, Ps- Bathanaha, Dist- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Bibi Runa Khatoon Wife of Md. Anwarul Resident of village- Fena Belahi, Ward no. 12, Ps- Bathanaha, Dist- Araria At P/A- Fulkaha bazar, Ward no. 6, Ps- Fulkaha Dist- Araria ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kishore Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP For Op2 :

Mr. Gopal Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-06-2026 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that dispute between the parties has been resolved through the process of mediation.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State.

3. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 110, 118(2), 117(2), 85, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of BNS and 3/ 4 of the D. P Act.

4. Earlier, the matter was referred to Patna High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre by order dated 07.04.2026 for resolution of dispute between the parties and in this regard, a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1128 of 2026(4) dt.22-06-2026 2/2 report dated 16.05.2026 kept at flag 'A', has been received. On perusal of Mediator's report, it appears that the dispute between the parties has been resolved on the terms and conditions mentioned in the Agreement (annexed with the Mediator's report).

5. Learned counsel for the informant does not dispute the contention made on behalf of the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM Araria in connection with Bathnaha P. S. Case No. 94 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita with further condition that petitioner shall abide by the terms & conditions of the agreement, arrived at between both parties before the Mediator.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/Alok RajU T