Usha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2445 of 2020 ====================================================== Usha Kumari Wife of Late Arun Das Resident of Mohalla- Subhash Nagar, Chhatauni Chowk, Motihari, Police Station- Chhatauni, District- East Champaran at Motihari.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Director Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Regional Deputy Director Education Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 4.
The District Magistrate East Champaran at Motihari. 5.
The District Education Officer East Champaran at Motihari. 6.
The District Programme Officer, Establishment East Champaran at Motihari. 7.
The Block Education Officer Motihari Muffasil, District- East Champaran at Motihari.
8.
The Block Education Officer, Chiraiya District- East Champaran, Motihari. 9.
The Accountant General Bihar (A and D), Birchand Patel Path, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mahendra Pathak, Adv.
Mr. Nagendra Upadhayay, Adv.
For the AG Mr. Ram Kinker Choubey, Adv.
For the State :
Mr. Jitendra Kr. Roy 1 (Sc13) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 09-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed the representation before the District Education Officer, East Champaran at Motihari but till date no action has been taken on the said representation.
3. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of with a
Patna High Court CWJC No.2445 of 2020(6) dt.09-09-2024 2/2 liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 6, District Programme Officer, Establishment, East Champaran at Motihari within a period of four weeks from today, the respondent no. 6 shall dispose of the same after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through her counsel by passing a reasoned and a speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of ten weeks, thereafter.
4. Respondent no. 6 shall be solely liable for noncompliance of this order within the stipulated period.
5. The writ petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U