Md. Idrish @ Idrish v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.914 of 2020 ====================================================== Md. Idrish @ Idrish, Son of Md. Abnas, Resident of Village& P.O.- Dhakaul, Ward No. 06, P.S. Pipradhi, District- Sheohar. ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Sheohar.

3.

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Sheohar. 4.

The Block Development Officer, Pipradhi, District- Sheohar. 5.

The Mukhiya, Dhankaul Gram Panchayat, Police Station- Pipradhi, DistrictSheohar. 6.

Sri Nasir Ahmad @ Lal Miya, Son of Usman Miya, Resident of VillageDhankaul, Police Station- Pipradhi, District- Sheohar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ritesh Kumar Narain Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prabhat Kumar Verma ( Aag3 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 16-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief/s: "(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ directing/ commanding the respondents not to construct a new P.C.C. Road, over old P.C.C. Road at Ward No. 5 in the Village- Dhankaul under Sheohar District as it has already been constructed in the month of January, 2019.

(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ directing the respondents to make repair the drainage which exists side by the P.C.C. Road at Ward No.5 in the Village-

Patna High Court CWJC No.914 of 2020(2) dt.16-01-2020 2/2 Dhankaul under Sheohar District."

After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the concerned respondents to consider and decide the representation, which the petitioner shall be making afresh within a period of four weeks from today. Learned counsel for the State states that upon receipt of such request, if any, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law, expeditiously and positively within a period of three months from the date of receipt thereof. Equally, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to take recourse to such alternative remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law.

We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, as are otherwise available in law, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law and with reasonable dispatch. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) uday/- U