Patna High CourtCR. MISC./91713/2025bail granted

Sanjeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-20Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91713 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-176 Year-2025 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar S/O Pramod Kumar Yadav @ Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Prasad Yadav R/O Vill- Barhara, Ward No 25, P.S.- Gogri, Dist.- Khagaria, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Seema Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No. 176 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 310(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, read with Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that there is recovery of one country made pistol from the possession of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91713 of 2025(2) dt.20-01-2026 2/2 possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner has been arrested only on the basis of suspicion. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of arms. The petitioner is in custody since 10.07.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Gogri P.S. Case No. 176 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T