← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./90593/2025disposed

Ajay Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-08Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90593 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-514 Year-2025 Thana- KANTI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Ajay Paswan S/o Chandeshwar Paswan R/o Village- Kanti Kothiya, PSKanti, Ward No. 9, Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nand Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 303(2), 132, 121(2), 109 and 121(1) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 20.10.2025, he received a secret information, at 10:30 a.m., that accused are selling liquor near an orchard, accordingly, the police team reached the place of occurrence, when it is alleged that the accused persons including the petitioner had scuffled with the police and created ruckus and Chhotu assaulted the informant with a sharp edged weapon causing injury on his head while Rithik snatched his mobile and also tried to snatch his pistol.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90593 of 2025(2) dt.08-01-2026 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that specific allegation of assaulting and snatching the mobile of the informant is against Chhotu and Rithik and as far as the petitioner is concerned, the allegation against him is general and omnibus in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Kanti P.S. Case No. 514 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T