← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1097/2026bail granted

Manjoor Ansari @ Md. Manjoor Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-15Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1097 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2025 Thana- Anandpur District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

Manjoor Ansari @ Md. Manjoor Ansari S/O Anjul Miyan R/O Village - Surangi, P.S- Anandpur, District- Banka.

2.

Abdul Gani S/O Manjoor Ansari @ Md. Manjoor Ansari R/O Village - Surangi, P.S- Anandpur, District- Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Brij Nandan Prasad, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are in custody in connection with Anandpur P.S Case No. 102 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109(1) BNS.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioners along with the other co-accused has assaulted the informant and the family members.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He next submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioners have fired gunshot but it missed and no one got injured. He further submits that as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1097 of 2026(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/2 far as petitioner no, 2 is concerned, there is no specific allegation against him. He further submits that there is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 12.10.2025 having clean antecedent.

5. However, learned APP for the State oppose the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. On perusal of the FIR and impugned order dated 09.12.2025, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Moreover, there is no specific allegation against any of the petitioners. So, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Banka in connection with Anandpur P.S Case No. 102 of 2025.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Sunnykr/- U