← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2288/2020dismiss for nonprosecution

Shambhu Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-29Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2288 of 2020 ====================================================== Shambhu Narayan Yadav, S/o Late Dahu Yadav, Resident of Village- Samda, P.S.- Ratanpura, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Bailey Road, Patna-800001 2.

The Chief Election Authority the Bihar State Election Authority, 32, Harding Road, Patna-800001 3.

The Secretary Bihar State Election Authority, 32, Harding Road, Patna800001 4.

The District Co-operative Officer Supaul 5.

The District Certificate Officer Supaul 6.

The Block Co-operative Officer Basantpur, Supaul 7.

The Block Development Officer-cum-Election Officer Primary Agriculture Co-operative Society, Basantpur, Supaul 8.

The Bihar State Co-operative Bank Ltd., Ashok Rajpath, Patna through its Managing Director, Bihar State Co-operative Bank Ltd., Ashok Rajpath, Patna 9.

The Managing Director Bihar State Co-operative Bank Ltd., Ashok Rajpath, Patna 10.

The Branch Manager Bihar State Co-operative Bank Ltd., Ashok Rajpath, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prakash Srivastava, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar, AC to AAG-11 For the Bank :

Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 29-08-2023 Heard the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the prayer of the petitioner is confined only to the acceptance of the nomination paper of the petitioner for the post of Chairman of Bhagwanpur Primary Agriculture Credit Society, Basantpur,

Patna High Court CWJC No.2288 of 2020(3) dt.29-08-2023 2/2 District - Supaul, however, the election has already been held and, as such, the present matter has become infructuous.

3. The aforesaid contention has not been confronted by the petitioner.

4. Considering the submission and taking note of the subsequent development, the present writ petition stands dismissed, having become infructuous.

(Harish Kumar, J) shivank/- U