Sujit Kumar Rai @ Sujit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2520 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-584 Year-2025 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== Sujit Kumar Rai @ Sujit Kumar son of Bigan Rai Resident Of VillageOlhanpur, Ps- Madhaura, Dist- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Harsh Anuj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Madhaura P.S. Case No. 584 of 2025, instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, on the date of occurrence when the informant was running his tea stall petitioner along with F.I.R. named accused persons came and started abusing the informant. On asking for the same, the accused persons assaulted the informant with legs and fists causing injury. It is alleged that petitioner assaulted the informant with dab causing injury on his head. The accused persons also snatched the golden chain of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2520 of 2026(3) dt.07-04-2026 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. In fact, informant and his family members had brutally assaulted the members of petitioner's side for which F.I.R. was lodged by the petitioner's side. Due to some trivial dispute between the parties, free fight took place. Injuries sustained by the informant is simple in nature which is lacerated wound caused by hard and blunt substance which does not corroborate the version of the informant. Other co-accused persons have already been granted anticipatory bail by the Court concerned. Petitioner has one criminal antecedent which belongs to Excise Act. Petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submission of learned counsel for the parties and injury does not corroborate the version of the informant, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2520 of 2026(3) dt.07-04-2026 3/3 Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Madhaura P.S. Case No. 584 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) rakhi/- U T