Sanjit Sao @ Sanjit Prasad @ Bulia @ Sanjit Saha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.355 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2019 Thana- IMAMGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Sanjit Sao @ Sanjit Prasad @ Bulia @ Sanjit Saha, aged about 40 years, Male, Son of Murli Saw Resident of Village-Tetaria Gilan, P.S-Imamganj, District-Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Javed Jafar Khan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 25-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Imamganj P.S. Case No. 208 of 2019 registered for offences under sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

As per prosecution case, the police has recovered 9 litres of English wine from the motorcycle.

The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the present petition. Looking to the quantity of liquor recovered as also the petitioner having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.355 of 2020(2) dt.25-02-2020 2/2 court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Excise Judge, Gaya in connection with Imamganj P.S. Case No. 208 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled. It is also made clear that if the petitioner is repeats the similar offence in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T