Anand Mohan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91744 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-583 Year-2022 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Anand Mohan Kumar S/O Late Keshav Kumar @ Late Keshav Kuwar Resident of village- Dilawarpur, P.S.- Kesariya, Dist.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Harsha Shashwat, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2026 Heard Ms. Harsha Shashwat, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 08.01.2024, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 118 of 2025 arising out of Kesariya P.S. Case No. 583 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 26.11.2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and other co-accused persons are alleged to have kidnapped the nephew of the informant and have committed murder.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. She further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. and the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91744 of 2025(5) dt.06-04-2026 2/2 petitioner has been made accused merely on the basis of suspicion.

5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the confessional statement of co-accused person, namely, Chhotu Kumar was recorded in paragraph-42 of the case diary in which he along with petitioner has committed the present crime in question and apart from that report of the learned Trial Court dated 30.01.2026 reveals that out of eight chargesheeted witnesses, six witnesses have already been examined and the case is pending for remaining two prosecution witnesses.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the report of the learned Trial Court, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 118 of 2025 arising out of Kesariya P.S. Case No. 583 of 2022 pending in the Court of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-10th, East Champaran, Motihari

7. Prayer is refused.

8. However, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest. Ibrar//- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T