Patna High CourtCR. MISC./90486/2025dismissed

Manish Rajak @ Mani Rajak v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-16Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90486 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2025 Thana- Rangara District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Manish Rajak @ Mani Rajak Son of Jagdambe Rajak @ Jagdambi Rajak Resident of Village - Sahauri, P.S.- Rangra, District - Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-04-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rangra P.S. Case No. 188 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The petitioner along with co-accused person is said to have killed the deceased, namely, Chhotu Razak.

4. The petitioner is in custody since 9.8.2025. 5.Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and have submitted that the petitioner has participated in the killing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90486 of 2025(5) dt.16-04-2026 2/2 of the deceased and therefore he may not be granted bail. Learned counsel for the informant has also undertaken to produce the witnesses in the trial on the dates fixed in the trial.

7. Considering the heinous nature of crime and the role assigned to the petitioner in the killing of the deceased, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8. Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

9. It is made clear that if the trial of the petitioner is delayed by the prosecution side then the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U