Sushil Kumar @ Sushil Kumar Puri v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-362 Year-2019 Thana- PARSABAZAR District- Patna ====================================================== SUSHIL KUMAR @ SUSHIL KUMAR PURI Son of Sri Narendra Puri Resident of Bashist Colony, Harnichak, Aam Bagicha, P.S.- Phulwari Sharif, District- Patna. ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhirendra Nath Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Defence of the petitioner is that there is case and counter case and the injuries sustained by the informant have been found to be simple in nature. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VIII, Patna in Parsa Bazar Police Station Case No. 362/2019, on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83 of 2020(2) dt.18-02-2020 2/2 on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T