← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/5281/2019dismissed

Jagdish Prasad Sah, v. The State Of Bihar

2023-10-06Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5281 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10512 of 2019 ====================================================== 1.

Jagdish Prasad Sah, Son of Deep Narayan Sah, resident of Village - mangalpur, P.S. and Block - Azam Nagar, panchayat- Azampur, Sadar, Barsoi, District- Katihar.

2.

Majhara Sharma, S/o Sri Shyamal Sharma, resident of Village - Mangalpur, P.S. and Block - Azam Nagar, panchayat- Azampur, Sadar, Barsoi, DistrictKatihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the State Chief Information Commissioner, Bihar, Patna, Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh.

2.

The District Officer, Katihar, Mr. Vijay Kumar. 3.

The Sub- Divisional Officer, Barsoi, Katihar, Mr. Shankar Sharan. 4.

The District Supply Officer, Katihar, Mr. Vivek Kumar. 5.

The Block Development Officer, Azam Nagar, Katihar, Mr. Sunil Mishra. 6.

The Block Agricultural Officer, Azam Nagar, Katihar, Mr. Chandra Deo Prasad.

7.

Shibu Narayan Singh, S/o Late Ram Sakal Singh, resident of VillageKalmegha, Panchayat- Amar Singh, Block- Azam Nagar, Sadar- Barsoi, District- Katihar.

8.

Anil Singh, S/o Sibu Narayn Singh, resident of Village- Kalmegha, Panchayat- Amar Singh, Block- Azam Nagar, Sadar- Barsoi, DistrictKatihar. 9.

The District Magistrate, Katihar Smt. Punam.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Maheshwar Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Prashant Pratap (Gp 2) Mr. Asit Kumar Jha, AC to GP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 06-10-2023 1.

In compliance of the order dated 09.07.2019, passed in CWJC No.10512 of 2019, the District Magistrate, Katihar, has passed a detailed order dated 25.07.2023, whereby

Patna High Court MJC No.5281 of 2019(4) dt.06-10-2023 2/2 and whereunder the case of the petitioner has been duly considered and appropriate directions have been issued, hence, this Court is satisfied that the order of this Court, disobedience whereof has been complained of, has stood complied with. 2.

Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U