← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85934/2019bail granted

Ramesh Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2020-01-14Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85934 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2019 Thana- CHHATAPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== RAMESH MANDAL Son of Nageshwar Mandal Resident of Village - Pariyahi, (Ward No.2), P.S.- Chhatapur, Distt.- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-01-2020 Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chhatapur P. S. Case No. 145 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 506 of IPC and Section 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

As per F.I.R. petitioner happens to be the husband of the informant and he has ousted the informant from the house. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that as a matter of fact, she was married with another person and she also claims that there is love affair with the petitioner, but he has not divorced the informant, as such, allegation under Section 498A of IPC is not made out against him. Petitioner is in custody since 19.08.2019. He is ready to co-operate in disposal of the trial.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85934 of 2019(2) dt.14-01-2020 2/2 Having heard both sides, in view of the submissions, made above, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 6th, Supaul, in connection with Chhatapur P. S. Case No. 145 of 2019, subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. Sunil Shukla/- (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) U T