Shubham Kumar @ Shubham Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91558 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-159 Year-2025 Thana- DHORAIYA District- Banka ====================================================== Shubham Kumar @ Shubham Kumar Sah, S/o- Dilip Sah, R/v- Khaira, PSAmarpur, District- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 19-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Dhoraiya P.S. Case no.159 of 2025, registered under sections 309(4) and 309(6) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that he is employed in a private bank and does the work of disbursement and collection of the loan amount. While returning along with the collected loan amount, it is stated that three unknown accused persons dashed their motorcycle with his vehicle as a result of which he fell down. On the point of revolver, they took away a total amount of Rs.45,000/- approx. as also the keys of his vehicle and escaped.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91558 of 2025(3) dt.19-03-2026 2/3 F.I.R. was registered against three unknown. The petitioner was falsely implicated in the case in course of investigation. Inspite of the petitioner having been in custody since 9.9.2025, chargesheet has been submitted in the case without putting the petitioner on T.I. Parade. No incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's possession.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State who submits that it has transpired in course of investigation in the statement of a witness that the petitioner along with others were heard by the witness planning to give effect to the occurrence. Further, the petitioner has confessed to his crime.
6. In response, it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner the so called statement of the witness has been recorded more than a month after the occurrence and the confessional statement allegedly made is before the police which is of no value.
7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the F.I.R., the material that has transpired in course of investigation, no incriminating article having been recovered from the petitioner's possession and the petitioner not having been put on T.I. Parade
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91558 of 2025(3) dt.19-03-2026 3/3 inspite of being in custody for more than 6 months since 9.9.2025 and charge-sheet having been submitted in the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Dhoraiya P.S. Case no.159 of 2025, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Banka.
(Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U T