Bipin Yadav @ Bipin Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91973 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2021 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== Bipin Yadav @ Bipin Kumar S/O Ramotar Yadav R/O Vill.- Bhikha, P.S.- Jhajha, Dist.- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanju Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 15-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 105 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 452, 342, 323, 380, 354(A), 380, 366(A), 506 and 34 of IPC.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that one Kusuma Devi made a written application on 10.04.2021 at about 12 hours when she was sleeping with her family then some persons variously armed with sharp weapons forcibly entered into her house and threatened to kill her family members. It is further alleged that Bipin yadav and other accused persons robbed jewelery and took away five lakh rupees. It is also alleged that Bipin Yadav and other accused persons kidnapped her daughter and took her away in a Scorpio car.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. The entire

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91973 of 2025(2) dt.15-01-2026 2/2 prosecution story is false, fabricated and concocted. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to neighbour dispute.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer of anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the fact that the allegations against the petitioner is serious in nature of having entered the house of informant having firearm weapons and of taking away Rs. 5,00,000/- and some ornaments made of silver and also that the minor daughter was also kidnapped by the petitioner and the accused persons. Under these circumstances, the Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail is rejected with a direction to the petitioner to surrender before the Court below concerned within six weeks from the date of this order and pray for regular bail, the learned Court below will consider his prayer for regular bail in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this Court.

(Alok Kumar Sinha, J) Gaurav Sinha/- U T