Md. Sajjo @ Md. Sajjo Mandal @ Md. Sajju v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86211 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-439 Year-2019 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== MD. SAJJO @ MD. SAJJO MANDAL @ MD. SAJJU Son of Md. Rashid Resident of Village - Raju Guru Kalpa, P.S.- Port, Distt - West Godawari, Andhra Pradesh ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajit Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 16-01-2020 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with K. Hat (Madhubani) PS case no. 439 of 2019 instituted for the offence punishable under Section 414 of Indian Penal Code. The allegation is regarding recovery of a stolen silver coloured Sumo Gold vehicle from a place situated in front of the house of one Rajeshwar Mandal and the petitioner is stated to have been apprehended from the lodge of the said Rajeshwar Mandal and upon interrogation, the petitioner disclosed that the said vehicle was given to him by the co-accused person namely Pankaj Srivastava.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86211 of 2019(2) dt.16-01-2020 2/2 submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, is having a clean antecedent and is languishing in custody since 22.06.2019. It is further submitted that neither the stolen vehicle has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner nor the petitioner has got anything to do with the alleged stolen vehicle.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner coupled with the fact that the petitioner is having a clean antecedent and the stolen vehicle has not been recovered from the petitioner, I deem it fit and appropriate to release the abovenamed petitioner on regular bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with K. Hat (Madhubani) PS case no. 439 of 2019.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U T