← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/4240/2025disposed

Rajendra Poddar v. The Vice Chancellor, T.M.B. University, Bhagalpur, Namely Prof. (Dr.) Jawahar Lal

2026-07-03Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4240 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5008 of 2021 ====================================================== Rajendra Poddar Son of Late Yogi Poddar, Resident of Village- Madurapur, P.S- Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Vice Chancellor, T.M.B. University, Bhagalpur, namely Prof. (Dr.) Jawahar Lal Bhagalpur.

2.

The Registrar, T.M.B. University, Bhagalpur, namely Dr. Vikash Chandra. 3.

The Principal namely Dr, Ashok Kr. Jha J.P. Collage, Narayanpur, Bhagalpur, namely 4.

The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna namely Mr. Dr. Rajendra, IAS. 5.

The Commissioner, Higher Education, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna namely Rajiv Raushan IAS.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the Opposite Party/s :

Government Advocate 2 Mr. Sumant Kumar Singh, AC to GA-2 Ms. Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-07-2026 Learned counsel for the Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University submits that the claim of the petitioner has already been allowed vide order dated 28.06.2026, as contained in Memo No. Legal-32/2021/178-179, which has been appended to the show cause filed on behalf of O.P. Nos. 1 to 3. It is, therefore, submitted that nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ application.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner is not present to

Patna High Court MJC No.4240 of 2025(7) dt.03-07-2026 2/2 controvert the statement made on behalf of the University.

3. In view of the statement made on behalf of the University, the contempt stands dropped.

4. Accordingly, the present application stands disposed.

5. The petitioner shall be at liberty to avail remedies as may be available in law, if any grievance still survives. (Ajit Kumar, J) shikha/- U