Samima Khatoon @ Samina Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9333 of 2020 Arising out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2019 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

SAMIMA KHATOON @ SAMINA KHATOON Wife of Late Md. Samiullah Resident of Village - Bhangarua, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran (Motihari) 2.

Ejaj Alam @ Ejaj Husain Son of Late Md. Samiullah Resident of Village - Bhangarua, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran (Motihari) 3.

Md. Meraj Alam @ Md. Meraj Son of Late Md. Samiullah Resident of Village - Bhangarua, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran (Motihari) 4.

Sohana Khatoon D/O - Late Md. Samiullah Underguardianship of her mother namely Shamina Khatoon., Resident of Village - Bhangarua, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran (Motihari). 5.

Farzana Khatoon Wife of Guddu Alam Resident of Village - Bhangarua, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran (Motihari) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Sabnam Khatoon Wife of Md. Sarfaraj Alam, D/O - Leyakat Ali Resident of Village - Bhangarua, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran (Motihari). At present Resident of Village - Gharbhusha, P.S.- Sangrampur, DistrictEast Champaran, Pin - 845434 ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mazharul Hassan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 202 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9333 of 2020(3) dt.29-02-2020 2/2 Allegation against the petitioners that they tortured the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are the in-laws and there is no specific allegation against the petitioners.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, the court below shall release them on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, East Champaran in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 202 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Vikash/- U T