Patna High CourtCR. MISC./91797/2025bail rejected

Sudhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-23Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91797 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2025 Thana- ROSHANGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Sudhir Kumar S/o Mithilesh Paswan @ Mithalesh Paswan R/o VillMeghnadih, PS- Raushanganj, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Javed Jafar Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Raushanganj P.S. Case No. 100 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that while minor daughter of the informant went to attend the nature's call, in the meantime, the petitioner took her in bush and committed rape upon her.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91797 of 2025(3) dt.23-02-2026 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that the allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that medical report is not available of the victim girl. The petitioner is in custody since 03.07.2025 and has got one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submitted that there is specific allegation levelled against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the victim has supported the prosecution case in her statement recorded under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and the gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. The prayer is rejected. The trial Court is directed to expedite the Trial.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T