Rinki Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.90938 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2025 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== RINKI DEVI W/O RAJAKUMAR YADAV, Daughter in Law of Avanti Devi, D/O Lalbahadur Yadav R/O Vill.- (Sasural)- Lakhapur, P.S.- Parasbigha, Dist.- Jahanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Damodar Prasad Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Parasbigha P.S. Case No. 212 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 103(1), 238, 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and others are accused of torturing and killing the deceased who was in a family way.

4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is the sister-in-law of the deceased and the daughter-in-law of the informant and she has falsely been implicated in this case.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the deceased has suffered heart attack and because of the same she died.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.90938 of 2025(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/2

6. Learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail and has submitted that no UD case was registered by the accused persons and they cremated the deceased without any information to her family.

7. No doubt, this is a serious case in which the deceased has died after three months of her marriage and the role of the in-laws and other co-accused cannot be ruled out but considering the fact that the petitioner is a young lady and she is daughter-in-law of the informant, this application is allowed.

8. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gayaji/concerned Court below in connection with Parasbigha P.S. Case No. 212 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U